Author
Listed:
- Changwoo Lee
- Jongduk Baek
Abstract
We investigated the effect of the optical blurring of X-ray source on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) image quality using well-designed DBT simulator and table-top experimental systems. To measure the in-plane modulation transfer function (MTF), we used simulated sphere phantom and Teflon sphere phantom and generated their projection data using two acquisition modes (i.e., step-and-shoot mode and continuous mode). After reconstruction, we measured the in-plane MTF using reconstructed sphere phantom images. In addition, we measured the anatomical noise power spectrum (aNPS) and signal detectability. We constructed simulated breast phantoms with a 50% volume glandular fraction (VGF) of breast anatomy using the power law spectrum and inserted spherical objects with 1 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm diameters as breast masses. Projection data were acquired using two acquisition modes, and in-plane breast images were reconstructed using the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm. For the experimental study, we used BR3D breast phantom with 50% VGF and obtained projection data using a table-top experimental system. To compare the detection performance of the two acquisition modes, we calculated the signal detectability using the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) with Laguerre-Gauss (LG) channels. Our results show that spatial resolution of in-plane image in continuous mode was degraded due to the optical blurring of X-ray source. This blurring effect was reflected in aNPS, resulting in large β values. From a signal detectability perspective, the signal detectability in step-and-shoot mode is higher than that in continuous mode for small spherical signals but not large spherical signals. Although the step-and-shoot mode has disadvantage in terms of scan time compared to the continuous mode, scanning in step-and-shoot mode is better for detecting small signals, indicating that there is a tradeoff between scan time and image quality.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.