IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0267275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic classification of lymphoma lesions in FDG-PET–Differentiation between tumor and non-tumor uptake

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas W Georgi
  • Axel Zieschank
  • Kevin Kornrumpf
  • Lars Kurch
  • Osama Sabri
  • Dieter Körholz
  • Christine Mauz-Körholz
  • Regine Kluge
  • Stefan Posch

Abstract

Introduction: The automatic classification of lymphoma lesions in PET is a main topic of ongoing research. An automatic algorithm would enable the swift evaluation of PET parameters, like texture and heterogeneity markers, concerning their prognostic value for patients outcome in large datasets. Moreover, the determination of the metabolic tumor volume would be facilitated. The aim of our study was the development and evaluation of an automatic algorithm for segmentation and classification of lymphoma lesions in PET. Methods: Pre-treatment PET scans from 60 Hodgkin lymphoma patients from the EuroNet-PHL-C1 trial were evaluated. A watershed algorithm was used for segmentation. For standardization of the scan length, an automatic cropping algorithm was developed. All segmented volumes were manually classified into one of 14 categories. The random forest method and a nested cross-validation was used for automatic classification and evaluation. Results: Overall, 853 volumes were segmented and classified. 203/246 tumor lesions and 554/607 non-tumor volumes were classified correctly by the automatic algorithm, corresponding to a sensitivity, a specificity, a positive and a negative predictive value of 83%, 91%, 79% and 93%. In 44/60 (73%) patients, all tumor lesions were correctly classified. In ten out of the 16 patients with misclassified tumor lesions, only one false-negative tumor lesion occurred. The automatic classification of focal gastrointestinal uptake, brown fat tissue and composed volumes consisting of more than one tissue was challenging. Conclusion: Our algorithm, trained on a small number of patients and on PET information only, showed a good performance and is suitable for automatic lymphoma classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas W Georgi & Axel Zieschank & Kevin Kornrumpf & Lars Kurch & Osama Sabri & Dieter Körholz & Christine Mauz-Körholz & Regine Kluge & Stefan Posch, 2022. "Automatic classification of lymphoma lesions in FDG-PET–Differentiation between tumor and non-tumor uptake," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0267275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.