IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0267140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The diagnostic value of nasal microbiota and clinical parameters in a multi-parametric prediction model to differentiate bacterial versus viral infections in lower respiratory tract infections

Author

Listed:
  • Yunlei Li
  • Chantal B van Houten
  • Stefan A Boers
  • Ruud Jansen
  • Asi Cohen
  • Dan Engelhard
  • Robert Kraaij
  • Saskia D Hiltemann
  • Jie Ju
  • David Fernández
  • Cristian Mankoc
  • Eva González
  • Wouter J de Waal
  • Karin M de Winter-de Groot
  • Tom F W Wolfs
  • Pieter Meijers
  • Bart Luijk
  • Jan Jelrik Oosterheert
  • Sanjay U C Sankatsing
  • Aik W J Bossink
  • Michal Stein
  • Adi Klein
  • Jalal Ashkar
  • Ellen Bamberger
  • Isaac Srugo
  • Majed Odeh
  • Yaniv Dotan
  • Olga Boico
  • Liat Etshtein
  • Meital Paz
  • Roy Navon
  • Tom Friedman
  • Einav Simon
  • Tanya M Gottlieb
  • Ester Pri-Or
  • Gali Kronenfeld
  • Kfir Oved
  • Eran Eden
  • Andrew P Stubbs
  • Louis J Bont
  • John P Hays

Abstract

Background: The ability to accurately distinguish bacterial from viral infection would help clinicians better target antimicrobial therapy during suspected lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Although technological developments make it feasible to rapidly generate patient-specific microbiota profiles, evidence is required to show the clinical value of using microbiota data for infection diagnosis. In this study, we investigated whether adding nasal cavity microbiota profiles to readily available clinical information could improve machine learning classifiers to distinguish bacterial from viral infection in patients with LRTI. Results: Various multi-parametric Random Forests classifiers were evaluated on the clinical and microbiota data of 293 LRTI patients for their prediction accuracies to differentiate bacterial from viral infection. The most predictive variable was C-reactive protein (CRP). We observed a marginal prediction improvement when 7 most prevalent nasal microbiota genera were added to the CRP model. In contrast, adding three clinical variables, absolute neutrophil count, consolidation on X-ray, and age group to the CRP model significantly improved the prediction. The best model correctly predicted 85% of the ‘bacterial’ patients and 82% of the ‘viral’ patients using 13 clinical and 3 nasal cavity microbiota genera (Staphylococcus, Moraxella, and Streptococcus). Conclusions: We developed high-accuracy multi-parametric machine learning classifiers to differentiate bacterial from viral infections in LRTI patients of various ages. We demonstrated the predictive value of four easy-to-collect clinical variables which facilitate personalized and accurate clinical decision-making. We observed that nasal cavity microbiota correlate with the clinical variables and thus may not add significant value to diagnostic algorithms that aim to differentiate bacterial from viral infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunlei Li & Chantal B van Houten & Stefan A Boers & Ruud Jansen & Asi Cohen & Dan Engelhard & Robert Kraaij & Saskia D Hiltemann & Jie Ju & David Fernández & Cristian Mankoc & Eva González & Wouter J , 2022. "The diagnostic value of nasal microbiota and clinical parameters in a multi-parametric prediction model to differentiate bacterial versus viral infections in lower respiratory tract infections," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267140
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267140&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0267140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.