Author
Listed:
- Mable Angela Nakubulwa
- Geva Greenfield
- Elena Pizzo
- Andreas Magusin
- Ian Maconochie
- Mitch Blair
- Derek Bell
- Azeem Majeed
- Ganesh Sathyamoorthy
- Thomas Woodcock
Abstract
National Health Service (NHS) 111 helpline was set up to improve access to urgent care in England, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of first-contact health services. Following trusted, authoritative advice is crucial for improved clinical outcomes. We examine patient and call-related characteristics associated with compliance with advice given in NHS 111 calls. The importance of health interactions that are not face-to-face has recently been highlighted by COVID-19 pandemic. In this retrospective cohort study, NHS 111 call records were linked to urgent and emergency care services data. We analysed data of 3,864,362 calls made between October 2013 and September 2017 relating to 1,964,726 callers across London. A multiple logistic regression was used to investigate associations between compliance with advice given and patient and call characteristics. Caller’s action is ‘compliant with advice given if first subsequent service interaction following contact with NHS 111 is consistent with advice given. We found that most calls were made by women (58%), adults aged 30–59 years (33%) and people in the white ethnic category (36%). The most common advice was for caller to contact their General Practitioner (GP) or other local services (18.2%) with varying times scales. Overall, callers followed advice given in 49% of calls. Compliance with triage advice was more likely in calls for children aged
Suggested Citation
Mable Angela Nakubulwa & Geva Greenfield & Elena Pizzo & Andreas Magusin & Ian Maconochie & Mitch Blair & Derek Bell & Azeem Majeed & Ganesh Sathyamoorthy & Thomas Woodcock, 2022.
"To what extent do callers follow the advice given by a non-emergency medical helpline (NHS 111): A retrospective cohort study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0267052
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267052
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.