IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Species identification skills predict in-depth knowledge about species

Author

Listed:
  • Michiel Jan Dirk Hooykaas
  • Menno Schilthuizen
  • Casper Johannes Albers
  • Ionica Smeets

Abstract

To raise biodiversity awareness effectively, communicators should be aware of knowledge levels in their audiences. Species identification skills have been used in the past as a measure of what people know about species, yet it is not known whether they serve as good indicators. To study the link between species identification and in-depth species knowledge, we presented an animal knowledge test to an online audience of over 7,000 Dutch adults, and used correlation and regression analyses to determine the extent to which species identification predicts in-depth knowledge about species’ origin, habitat, diet, and behavior. We found that in-depth knowledge was higher in those who correctly identified species as compared with those who did not correctly identify species, for all four types of in-depth knowledge. Moreover, as compared to alternative variables (work, age, gender, and educational level), species identification was by far the best predictor for in-depth knowledge about species. However, species identification levels were generally higher than levels of in-depth knowledge, and knowledge gaps and misconceptions were uncovered. The results confirm the value of species identification tests, but also highlight limitations and challenges that should be taken into account when establishing knowledge levels and communicating biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiel Jan Dirk Hooykaas & Menno Schilthuizen & Casper Johannes Albers & Ionica Smeets, 2022. "Species identification skills predict in-depth knowledge about species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266972
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266972
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266972&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Davies & Andrew Cowley & Jon Bennie & Catherine Leyshon & Richard Inger & Hazel Carter & Beth Robinson & James Duffy & Stefano Casalegno & Gwladys Lambert & Kevin Gaston, 2018. "Popular interest in vertebrates does not reflect extinction risk and is associated with bias in conservation investment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0199149 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rikki Gumbs & Oenone Scott & Ryan Bates & Monika Böhm & Félix Forest & Claudia L. Gray & Michael Hoffmann & Daniel Kane & Christopher Low & William D. Pearse & Sebastian Pipins & Benjamin Tapley & Sam, 2024. "Global conservation status of the jawed vertebrate Tree of Life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.