IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary study for dose evaluation depending on dose range with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter considering individual dosimeter sensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Su Chul Han

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate dose evaluation depending on dose range using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) and evaluate the possibility of high dose evaluation. This study investigated a commercial OSLD and used a Co-60 gamma irradiator for irradiation. The OSLDs (N = 26) were sampled in total OSLDs (N = 46) depending on the radiation sensitivity for this study. After irradiating doses from 0.5 to 40 Gy at fixed intervals in a standard environment, the dose response of a reference OSLD (N = 5) was determined through the reading process at each dose. The dose-response curves obtained from the reference OSLD were fitted according to the dose. In the dose range below 3 Gy, a linear function was used to determine the relationship between dose and the OSLD response. Quadratic and cubic functions were applied for dose ranges of up to 15 Gy and 40 Gy, respectively. Test OSLDs (N = 21) were evaluated at various doses (2.5 to 30 Gy) using different fitting functions, according to dose ranges. When doses from 0.5 Gy to 3.0 Gy were curve-fitted to the linear function, the relationship was y = 70278.0x − 3125.3 (r2 = 0.999). When doses of up to 15 Gy were curve-fitted to the quadratic function, the relationship was y = 628.6x2 + 70444.6x − 6142.3 (r2 = 0.999). Furthermore, when doses of up to 40 Gy were curve-fitted to the cubic function, the relation was y = −15.5x3 + 527.3x2 + 75059.6x − 16260.3 (r2 = 0.998). Test OSLDs were evaluated for various dose ranges based on the above equation. It was confirmed that the average difference was 0.86 ± 0.27%, and it was evaluated that the largest difference occurred at 30 Gy (2.24 ± 0.24%). In this study, we prove that measurements using the OSLD at various dose ranges, including high doses, will be possible through the application of an in-house software program and a correction process.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Chul Han, 2022. "Preliminary study for dose evaluation depending on dose range with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter considering individual dosimeter sensitivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266110
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266110&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.