IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using machine learning to understand age and gender classification based on infant temperament

Author

Listed:
  • Maria A Gartstein
  • D Erich Seamon
  • Jennifer A Mattera
  • Michelle Bosquet Enlow
  • Rosalind J Wright
  • Koraly Perez-Edgar
  • Kristin A Buss
  • Vanessa LoBue
  • Martha Ann Bell
  • Sherryl H Goodman
  • Susan Spieker
  • David J Bridgett
  • Amy L Salisbury
  • Megan R Gunnar
  • Shanna B Mliner
  • Maria Muzik
  • Cynthia A Stifter
  • Elizabeth M Planalp
  • Samuel A Mehr
  • Elizabeth S Spelke
  • Angela F Lukowski
  • Ashley M Groh
  • Diane M Lickenbrock
  • Rebecca Santelli
  • Tina Du Rocher Schudlich
  • Stephanie Anzman-Frasca
  • Catherine Thrasher
  • Anjolii Diaz
  • Carolyn Dayton
  • Kameron J Moding
  • Evan M Jordan

Abstract

Age and gender differences are prominent in the temperament literature, with the former particularly salient in infancy and the latter noted as early as the first year of life. This study represents a meta-analysis utilizing Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R) data collected across multiple laboratories (N = 4438) to overcome limitations of smaller samples in elucidating links among temperament, age, and gender in early childhood. Algorithmic modeling techniques were leveraged to discern the extent to which the 14 IBQ-R subscale scores accurately classified participating children as boys (n = 2,298) and girls (n = 2,093), and into three age groups: youngest ( 48 weeks; n = 779). Additionally, simultaneous classification into age and gender categories was performed, providing an opportunity to consider the extent to which gender differences in temperament are informed by infant age. Results indicated that overall age group classification was more accurate than child gender models, suggesting that age-related changes are more salient than gender differences in early childhood with respect to temperament attributes. However, gender-based classification was superior in the oldest age group, suggesting temperament differences between boys and girls are accentuated with development. Fear emerged as the subscale contributing to accurate classifications most notably overall. This study leads infancy research and meta-analytic investigations more broadly in a new direction as a methodological demonstration, and also provides most optimal comparative data for the IBQ-R based on the largest and most representative dataset to date.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria A Gartstein & D Erich Seamon & Jennifer A Mattera & Michelle Bosquet Enlow & Rosalind J Wright & Koraly Perez-Edgar & Kristin A Buss & Vanessa LoBue & Martha Ann Bell & Sherryl H Goodman & Susan, 2022. "Using machine learning to understand age and gender classification based on infant temperament," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266026
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266026&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.