IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0265584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors for Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dashan Li
  • Yuanyuan Li
  • Hanxu Zeng
  • Yonggui Wu

Abstract

Purpose: Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis (EPS) is the most serious complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD), which considerably reduces the patient’s quality of life, leading to patients discontinuing PD. Considering these negative effects, it is necessary to systematically review and determine the risk factors of EPS. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) were searched from their inception to January 1st, 2022, and the bibliographies from the citations of relevant articles were manually searched. The ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized studies of Interventions) tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of included studies. Results: Ten studies involving 12595 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that a younger age at PD onset (MD = -7.70, 95% CI, -11.53~-3.86), a higher transporter (MD = 0.13, 95% CI, 0.09~0.18), a longer PD duration (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI, 0.68~1.61), a longer peritonitis duration (MD = 12.66, 95% CI, 3.85~21.47), and history of glomerulonephritis (OR = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.02~1.97) were significant risk factors for EPS. However, sex, use of icodextrin, the number of peritonitis episodes, and history of multicystic kidney disease did not affect the risk of EPS. Conclusions: This review provides a scientific basis for further understanding the etiology of PD-related EPS and improving prevention strategies. More high-quality studies are necessary to validate this paper’s findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Dashan Li & Yuanyuan Li & Hanxu Zeng & Yonggui Wu, 2022. "Risk factors for Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265584
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265584
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265584&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0265584?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.