IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0264438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is a single dose of commonly used antibiotics effective in preventing maternal infection after cesarean section? A network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Huang
  • Xinbo Yin
  • Xiaokai Wang
  • Fangyi Zhou
  • Xiaoxia Cao
  • Yeqiong Han
  • Shichang Sun

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different antibiotic classes and dosages in preventing maternal infection after cesarean delivery. Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1980 and January 2021 on antibiotic use for the prevention of maternal infection after cesarean delivery. The outcomes were endometritis, febrile morbidity, and wound infection, reported as odds ratios (OR) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis scores. Results: A total of 31 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. In the network meta-analysis (NMA) for endometritis, pooled network OR values indicated that the following interventions were superior to placebo: cephalosporins (OR: 0.18, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 0.07–0.45), penicillins (OR: 0.19, 95% CrI: 0.07–0.50), penicillins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.20, 95% CrI: 0.05–0.65), combination therapies (OR: 0.22, 95% CrI: 0.09–0.54), and cephalosporins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.25, 95% CrI: 0.08–0.74). In the NMA for febrile morbidity, placebo was more effective than the other interventions. In the NMA for wound infection, pooled network OR values indicated that the following interventions were superior to placebo: penicillin (OR: 0.14, 95% CrI: 0.05–0.37), cephalosporins (OR: 0.19, 95% CrI: 0.08–0.41), cephalosporins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.20, 95% CrI: 0.06–0.58), combination therapies (OR: 0.29, 95% CrI: 0.13–0.57), macrolides (OR: 0.33, 95% CrI: 0.15–0.74), and penicillins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.40, 95% CrI: 0.17–0.91). Conclusions: Compared with placebo, a single dose of commonly used antibiotics may prevent maternal infection after cesarean delivery. However, the incidence of febrile morbidity was not reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Huang & Xinbo Yin & Xiaokai Wang & Fangyi Zhou & Xiaoxia Cao & Yeqiong Han & Shichang Sun, 2022. "Is a single dose of commonly used antibiotics effective in preventing maternal infection after cesarean section? A network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264438
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264438
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264438&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0264438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.