IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0264329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinically adjudicated deceased donor acute kidney injury and graft outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Sherry G Mansour
  • Nadeen Khoury
  • Ravi Kodali
  • Sarthak Virmani
  • Peter P Reese
  • Isaac E Hall
  • Yaqi Jia
  • Yu Yamamoto
  • Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook
  • Wassim Obeid
  • Mona D Doshi
  • Enver Akalin
  • Jonathan S Bromberg
  • Meera N Harhay
  • Sumit Mohan
  • Thangamani Muthukumar
  • Pooja Singh
  • Francis L Weng
  • Dennis G Moledina
  • Jason H Greenberg
  • Francis P Wilson
  • Chirag R Parikh

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in deceased donors is not associated with graft failure (GF). We hypothesize that hemodynamic AKI (hAKI) comprises the majority of donor AKI and may explain this lack of association. Methods: In this ancillary analysis of the Deceased Donor Study, 428 donors with available charts were selected to identify those with and without AKI. AKI cases were classified as hAKI, intrinsic (iAKI), or mixed (mAKI) based on majority adjudication by three nephrologists. We evaluated the associations between AKI phenotypes and delayed graft function (DGF), 1-year eGFR and GF. We also evaluated differences in urine biomarkers among AKI phenotypes. Results: Of the 291 (68%) donors with AKI, 106 (36%) were adjudicated as hAKI, 84 (29%) as iAKI and 101 (35%) as mAKI. Of the 856 potential kidneys, 669 were transplanted with 32% developing DGF and 5% experiencing GF. Median 1-year eGFR was 53 (IQR: 41–70) ml/min/1.73m2. Compared to non-AKI, donors with iAKI had higher odds DGF [aOR (95%CI); 4.83 (2.29, 10.22)] and had lower 1-year eGFR [adjusted B coefficient (95% CI): -11 (-19, -3) mL/min/1.73 m2]. hAKI and mAKI were not associated with DGF or 1-year eGFR. Rates of GF were not different among AKI phenotypes and non-AKI. Urine biomarkers such as NGAL, LFABP, MCP-1, YKL-40, cystatin-C and albumin were higher in iAKI. Conclusion: iAKI was associated with higher DGF and lower 1-year eGFR but not with GF. Clinically phenotyped donor AKI is biologically different based on biomarkers and may help inform decisions regarding organ utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherry G Mansour & Nadeen Khoury & Ravi Kodali & Sarthak Virmani & Peter P Reese & Isaac E Hall & Yaqi Jia & Yu Yamamoto & Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook & Wassim Obeid & Mona D Doshi & Enver Akalin & J, 2022. "Clinically adjudicated deceased donor acute kidney injury and graft outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264329
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264329&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0264329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.