IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0263182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the effectiveness of the online clinical clerkship curriculum: Development of a multivariate prediction model and validation study

Author

Listed:
  • Naoto Kuroda
  • Anna Suzuki
  • Kai Ozawa
  • Nobuhiro Nagai
  • Yurika Okuyama
  • Kana Koshiishi
  • Masafumi Yamada
  • Makoto Kikukawa

Abstract

Given scientific and technological advancements, expectations of online medical education are increasing. However, there is no way to predict the effectiveness of online clinical clerkship curricula. To develop a prediction model, we conducted cross-sectional national surveys in Japan. Social media surveys were conducted among medical students in Japan during the periods May–June 2020 and February–March 2021. We used the former for the derivation dataset and the latter for the validation dataset. We asked students questions in three areas: 1) opportunities to learn from each educational approach (lectures, medical quizzes, assignments, oral presentations, observation of physicians’ practice, clinical skills practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, and interactive discussions with physicians) in online clinical clerkships compared to face-to-face, 2) frequency of technical problems on online platforms, and 3) satisfaction and motivation as outcome measurements. We developed a scoring system based on a multivariate prediction model for satisfaction and motivation in a cross-sectional study of 1,671 medical students during the period May–June 2020. We externally validated this scoring with a cross-sectional study of 106 medical students during February–March 2021 and assessed its predictive performance. The final prediction models in the derivation dataset included eight variables (frequency of lectures, medical quizzes, oral presentations, observation of physicians’ practice, clinical skills practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, interactive discussions with physicians, and technical problems). We applied the prediction models created using the derivation dataset to a validation dataset. The prediction performance values, based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 0.69 for satisfaction (sensitivity, 0.50; specificity, 0.89) and 0.75 for motivation (sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.85). We developed a prediction model for the effectiveness of the online clinical clerkship curriculum, based on students’ satisfaction and motivation. Our model will accurately predict and improve the online clinical clerkship curriculum effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoto Kuroda & Anna Suzuki & Kai Ozawa & Nobuhiro Nagai & Yurika Okuyama & Kana Koshiishi & Masafumi Yamada & Makoto Kikukawa, 2022. "Predicting the effectiveness of the online clinical clerkship curriculum: Development of a multivariate prediction model and validation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263182
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263182&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0263182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.