IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0262653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are high medical costs incurred by people with disabilities excessive?: An empirical analysis of Korean National Health Insurance Data

Author

Listed:
  • Min Jung Hong
  • Changwoo Lee
  • Clara Lee
  • Ye-Soon Kim
  • Jae Yeon Jeong
  • Junha Park
  • Dong Wook Shin
  • Euichul Shin

Abstract

A crude comparison of medical costs between people with disabilities (PWD) and without disabilities (PWoD) shows a much higher expenditure among PWD and such results have been a cause for further stigmatization. This study aims to empirically analyze whether the medical costs for PWD are actually high when characteristics related to medical costs are adjusted. Ten percent of the total population was randomly selected from the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) Database in 2016. A crude comparative analysis was performed to calculate the medical cost of PWD and PWoD. A subsequent multiple regression analysis was conducted to adjust factors affecting the medical costs such as socioeconomic status, disease, and health behavior-related characteristics. The medical cost for PWD was 3.6 times higher than that for PWoD by crude comparison. However, after multiple regression analysis, margin of difference decreased to 1.5 times although the cost for PWD remained higher. Substantial decrease in higher medical costs for PWD after multiple analyses compared to crude analysis implies that additional adjustment using variables such as disease severity, not available in the NHI database, may predict a further reduction in differences. Thus, it is difficult to determine that the medical expenditure for PWD is excessive.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Jung Hong & Changwoo Lee & Clara Lee & Ye-Soon Kim & Jae Yeon Jeong & Junha Park & Dong Wook Shin & Euichul Shin, 2022. "Are high medical costs incurred by people with disabilities excessive?: An empirical analysis of Korean National Health Insurance Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262653
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262653&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0262653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.