IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0260776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study protocol for a two-site clinical trial to validate a smartphone-based artificial intelligence classifier identifying cervical precancer and cancer in HPV-positive women in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Inès Baleydier
  • Pierre Vassilakos
  • Roser Viñals
  • Ania Wisniak
  • Bruno Kenfack
  • Jovanny Tsuala Fouogue
  • George Enownchong Enow Orock
  • Sophie Lemoupa Makajio
  • Evelyn Foguem Tincho
  • Manuela Undurraga
  • Magali Cattin
  • Solomzi Makohliso
  • Klaus Schönenberger
  • Alain Gervaix
  • Jean-Philippe Thiran
  • Patrick Petignat

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to financial and logistical issues. WHO recommendation for cervical cancer screening in LMICs includes HPV testing as primary screening followed by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and treatment. However, VIA is a subjective procedure dependent on the healthcare provider’s experience. Its accuracy can be improved by computer-aided detection techniques. Our aim is to assess the performance of a smartphone-based Automated VIA Classifier (AVC) relying on Artificial Intelligence to discriminate precancerous and cancerous lesions from normal cervical tissue. Methods: The AVC study will be nested in an ongoing cervical cancer screening program called “3T-study” (for Test, Triage and Treat), including HPV self-sampling followed by VIA triage and treatment if needed. After application of acetic acid on the cervix, precancerous and cancerous cells whiten more rapidly than non-cancerous ones and their whiteness persists stronger overtime. The AVC relies on this key feature to determine whether the cervix is suspect for precancer or cancer. In order to train and validate the AVC, 6000 women aged 30 to 49 years meeting the inclusion criteria will be recruited on a voluntary basis, with an estimated 100 CIN2+, calculated using a confidence level of 95% and an estimated sensitivity of 90% +/-7% precision on either side. Diagnostic test performance of AVC test and two current standard tests (VIA and cytology) used routinely for triage will be evaluated and compared. Histopathological examination will serve as reference standard. Participants’ and providers’ acceptability of the technology will also be assessed. The study protocol was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT04859530). Expected results: The study will determine whether AVC test can be an effective method for cervical cancer screening in LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Inès Baleydier & Pierre Vassilakos & Roser Viñals & Ania Wisniak & Bruno Kenfack & Jovanny Tsuala Fouogue & George Enownchong Enow Orock & Sophie Lemoupa Makajio & Evelyn Foguem Tincho & Manuela Undur, 2021. "Study protocol for a two-site clinical trial to validate a smartphone-based artificial intelligence classifier identifying cervical precancer and cancer in HPV-positive women in Cameroon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260776
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260776
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260776&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0260776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.