IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0260517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jee Soo Park
  • Dong Wook Kim
  • Dongu Lee
  • Taeju Lee
  • Kyo Chul Koo
  • Woong Kyu Han
  • Byung Ha Chung
  • Kwang Suk Lee

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. Methods: Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. Results: Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and

Suggested Citation

  • Jee Soo Park & Dong Wook Kim & Dongu Lee & Taeju Lee & Kyo Chul Koo & Woong Kyu Han & Byung Ha Chung & Kwang Suk Lee, 2021. "Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260517
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260517
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260517&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.