IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0259092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of staffing model conversion from a mandatory critical care consultation model to a closed unit model in the medical intensive care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Jun Ko
  • Jaeyoung Cho
  • Sun Mi Choi
  • Young Sik Park
  • Chang-Hoon Lee
  • Chul-Gyu Yoo
  • Jinwoo Lee
  • Sang-Min Lee

Abstract

Background: The intensive care unit (ICU) staffing model affects clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. However, the benefits of a closed unit model have not been extensively compared to those of a mandatory critical care consultation model. Methods: This retrospective before-after study included patients admitted to the medical ICU. Anthropometric data, admission reason, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade, survival status, length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, duration of mechanical ventilator care, and occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were recorded. The staffing model of the medical ICU was changed from a mandatory critical care consultation model to a closed unit model in September 2017, and indices before and after the conversion were compared. Results: A total of 1,526 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 64.5 years, and 954 (62.5%) patients were men. The mean LOS in the ICU among survivors was shorter in the closed unit model than in the mandatory critical care consultation model by multiple regression analysis (5.5 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.005). Central venous catheter insertion (38.5% vs. 51.9%; p

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Jun Ko & Jaeyoung Cho & Sun Mi Choi & Young Sik Park & Chang-Hoon Lee & Chul-Gyu Yoo & Jinwoo Lee & Sang-Min Lee, 2021. "Impact of staffing model conversion from a mandatory critical care consultation model to a closed unit model in the medical intensive care unit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259092
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259092
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259092&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0259092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.