IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0258532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment after caesarean section in Sierra Leone: An evaluation of the free health care initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Alex J van Duinen
  • Josien Westendorp
  • Thomas Ashley
  • Lars Hagander
  • Hampus Holmer
  • Alimamy P Koroma
  • Andrew J M Leather
  • Mark G Shrime
  • Arne Wibe
  • Håkon A Bolkan

Abstract

Background: Utilizing surgical services, including caesarean sections, can result in catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment. In 2010, Sierra Leone introduced the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI), a national financial risk protection program for the most vulnerable groups. Aim of this study was to investigate catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment related to caesarean section in Sierra Leone and evaluate the impact of the FHCI. Methods: Women who delivered by caesarean section in nine hospitals were followed up with home visits one month after surgery, and data on medical and non-medical expenditures were collected. Individual income was estimated based on household characteristics and used to determine catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment for each patient. The impact of the FHCI was assessed by comparing actual expenditure with counterfactual expenditures had the initiative not existed. Results: For the 1146 patients in the study, the median expenditure was 23 (IQR 4; 56) international dollars (Int$). Patients in the poorest quintile spent a median Int$ 59 (IQR 28; 76), which was significantly more than patients in the richest quintile, who spent a median Int$ 17 (IQR 2; 38, p

Suggested Citation

  • Alex J van Duinen & Josien Westendorp & Thomas Ashley & Lars Hagander & Hampus Holmer & Alimamy P Koroma & Andrew J M Leather & Mark G Shrime & Arne Wibe & Håkon A Bolkan, 2021. "Catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment after caesarean section in Sierra Leone: An evaluation of the free health care initiative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258532
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258532
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258532&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0258532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.