IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0258377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of recurrent stroke among ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: Development and validation of a risk score model

Author

Listed:
  • Beom Joon Kim
  • Keon-Joo Lee
  • Eun Lyeong Park
  • Kanta Tanaka
  • Masatoshi Koga
  • Sohei Yoshimura
  • Ryo Itabashi
  • Jae-Kwan Cha
  • Byung-Chul Lee
  • Hisanao Akiyama
  • Yoshinari Nagakane
  • Juneyoung Lee
  • Kazunori Toyoda
  • for the SAMURAI Study Investigators
  • Hee-Joon Bae
  • for the CRCS-K Investigators

Abstract

Background: There is currently no validated risk prediction model for recurrent events among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Considering that the application of conventional risk scores has contextual limitations, new strategies are needed to develop such a model. Here, we set out to develop and validate a comprehensive risk prediction model for stroke recurrence in AIS patients with AF. Methods: AIS patients with AF were collected from multicenter registries in South Korea and Japan. A developmental dataset was constructed with 5648 registered cases from both countries for the period 2011‒2014. An external validation dataset was also created, consisting of Korean AIS subjects with AF registered between 2015 and 2018. Event outcomes were collected during 1 year after the index stroke. A multivariable prediction model was developed using the Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard model with non-stroke mortality as a competing risk. The model incorporated 21 clinical variables and was further validated, calibrated, and revised using the external validation dataset. Results: The developmental dataset consisted of 4483 Korean and 1165 Japanese patients (mean age, 74.3 ± 10.2 years; male 53%); 338 patients (6%) had recurrent stroke and 903 (16%) died. The clinical profiles of the external validation set (n = 3668) were comparable to those of the developmental dataset. The c-statistics of the final model was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.66 ‒0.71). The developed prediction model did not show better discriminative ability for predicting stroke recurrence than the conventional risk prediction tools (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and ATRIA). Conclusions: Neither conventional risk stratification tools nor our newly developed comprehensive prediction model using available clinical factors seemed to be suitable for identifying patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke among AIS patients with AF in this modern direct oral anticoagulant era. Detailed individual information, including imaging, may be warranted to build a more robust and precise risk prediction model for stroke survivors with AF.

Suggested Citation

  • Beom Joon Kim & Keon-Joo Lee & Eun Lyeong Park & Kanta Tanaka & Masatoshi Koga & Sohei Yoshimura & Ryo Itabashi & Jae-Kwan Cha & Byung-Chul Lee & Hisanao Akiyama & Yoshinari Nagakane & Juneyoung Lee &, 2021. "Prediction of recurrent stroke among ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: Development and validation of a risk score model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258377
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258377&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0258377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.