IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0258241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world

Author

Listed:
  • Kay L Ritchie
  • Charlotte Cartledge
  • Bethany Growns
  • An Yan
  • Yuqing Wang
  • Kun Guo
  • Robin S S Kramer
  • Gary Edmond
  • Kristy A Martire
  • Mehera San Roque
  • David White

Abstract

Automatic facial recognition technology (AFR) is increasingly used in criminal justice systems around the world, yet to date there has not been an international survey of public attitudes toward its use. In Study 1, we ran focus groups in the UK, Australia and China (countries at different stages of adopting AFR) and in Study 2 we collected data from over 3,000 participants in the UK, Australia and the USA using a questionnaire investigating attitudes towards AFR use in criminal justice systems. Our results showed that although overall participants were aligned in their attitudes and reasoning behind them, there were some key differences across countries. People in the USA were more accepting of tracking citizens, more accepting of private companies’ use of AFR, and less trusting of the police using AFR than people in the UK and Australia. Our results showed that support for the use of AFR depends greatly on what the technology is used for and who it is used by. We recommend vendors and users do more to explain AFR use, including details around accuracy and data protection. We also recommend that governments should set legal boundaries around the use of AFR in investigative and criminal justice settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay L Ritchie & Charlotte Cartledge & Bethany Growns & An Yan & Yuqing Wang & Kun Guo & Robin S S Kramer & Gary Edmond & Kristy A Martire & Mehera San Roque & David White, 2021. "Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258241
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258241&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0258241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.