IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0255352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy
  • Thangaraj Abiramalatha
  • Tapas Bandyopadhyay
  • Nasreen Banu Shaik
  • Prathik Bandiya
  • Debasish Nanda
  • Abdul Kareem Pullattayil S.
  • Srinivas Murki
  • Charles Christoph Roehr

Abstract

Context: Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied. Objectives: Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs. Data sources: CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Study selection: Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. Data extraction and synthesis: Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE). Results: 192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE–low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE—moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000–2009 and 2010–2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs—8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW—7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs—6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs. Limitations: CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020222873).

Suggested Citation

  • Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy & Thangaraj Abiramalatha & Tapas Bandyopadhyay & Nasreen Banu Shaik & Prathik Bandiya & Debasish Nanda & Abdul Kareem Pullattayil S. & Srinivas Murki & Charles Ch, 2021. "ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0255352
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255352&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0255352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0255352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.