IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0251889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Hager
  • Homan Taufik
  • Friederike Blum
  • Andrea Stockero
  • Martin Wiesmann
  • Arno Reich
  • Rebecca May
  • Omid Nikoubashman

Abstract

Background and purpose: During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We analyzed the effects of this feedback on work satisfaction, work meaningfulness and valuation of the therapy among our staff. Methods: Our staff completed two self-reported questionnaires before and after the period of six months with systematic feedback. Results: Employees with higher work meaningfulness and higher work satisfaction valuated endovascular stroke therapy as more useful (p

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Hager & Homan Taufik & Friederike Blum & Andrea Stockero & Martin Wiesmann & Arno Reich & Rebecca May & Omid Nikoubashman, 2021. "Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251889
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0251889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.