IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0251724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the Continuous Traumatic Stress Response scale (CTSR) among adults exposed to ongoing security threats

Author

Listed:
  • Aviva Goral
  • Paula Feder-Bubis
  • Mooli Lahad
  • Sandro Galea
  • Norm O’Rourke
  • Limor Aharonson-Daniel

Abstract

Background: Current diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) do not include symptoms resulting from exposure to continuous or ongoing traumatic stress. Thus existing assessment tools do not fully capture stress symptoms associated with exposure to threats that extend over months or years. To address this void, we enumerated the symptoms associate with ongoing exposure to stress including those that are distinct from existing PTSD diagnostic criteria. Objectives: To develop the Continuous Traumatic Stress Response Scale (CTSR) and assess its psychometric properties. Method: We sampled 313 adults exposed and unexposed to ongoing security threat between December 2016 and February 2017. Respondents lived in communities bordering the Gaza Strip in southern Israel where they are exposed to frequent rocket attacks, requiring they locate and find shelter in 30 seconds or less. We assessed the concurrent validity of CTSR relative to the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS). Results: On the basis of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we retained 11 of 25 items measuring three distinct factors: exhaustion/detachment, rage/betrayal, and fear/helplessness. We found moderate concurrence between the scales; that is, the CTSR appears to measure a construct related to, but distinct from PTSD. This conclusion is supported by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicating that each factor significantly contributes to measurement of a higher-order, continuous traumatic stress latent construct. Conclusions: These results support the psychometric properties of CTSR. Future research is required to confirm these findings in other countries and cultures and among individuals exposed to other forms of continuous traumatic stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Aviva Goral & Paula Feder-Bubis & Mooli Lahad & Sandro Galea & Norm O’Rourke & Limor Aharonson-Daniel, 2021. "Development and validation of the Continuous Traumatic Stress Response scale (CTSR) among adults exposed to ongoing security threats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251724
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251724
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251724&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0251724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mooli Lahad & Dmitry Leykin & Ornit Rozenblat & Zvi Fajerman, 2014. "Exploring the Efficacy of Anxiety and PTSD Therapeutic Techniques and Protocols in Practice During Ongoing Terrorism: Evidence From a Focus Group Research," International Journal of Social Work, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 49-69, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meytal Eran-Jona & Roni Tiargan-Orr & Stephen Z. Levine & Yehiel Limor & Mordechai Schenhav & Uzi Ben-Shalom, 2022. "Habituation of Fear—Israeli-Jewish Population during Protracted Belligerence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.