IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0249927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cornea donation process and tissue quality for transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Karinny Pereira Cruz
  • Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior
  • Oleci Pereira Frota
  • Elen Ferraz Teston
  • Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos
  • Allyne Fortes Vitor
  • Mayk Penza Cardoso
  • Fábio Rogério Rodrigues Leocates de Moraes

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of the corneal tissue can be influenced by several factors inherent to the recipient, donor, and to the donation and transplantation process. The donated corneal tissue can be classified by its quality as excellent, good, regular, bad, or unacceptable for transplantation, evaluating it in a slit lamp. Objective: To analyze the relationship between the clinical and sociodemographic variables of the donors and the donation process and the classification of the quality of the corneal tissue collected for transplantation. Methods: This is an epidemiologic study, retrospective cohort type, which addressed the process of cornea donation by the Human Eye Tissue Bank in a reference service in Northeast Brazil. The sample consisted of corneas processed by the Human Eye Tissue Bank of Rio Grande do Norte (n = 419). For descriptive and inferential analysis, the study used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25.0, and considered a significance level of 0.05. Logistic regression analysis was used for the adjustment of the final model. Results: It was verified that the epidemiological profile showed a prevalence of individuals with a mean age of 42.54 years old, male (73.99%), and living in the metropolitan region of the state capital (75.66%). When analyzing the relationship between the clinical and sociodemographic variables of the donors, it was identified that those aged 45 years old or less had better quality corneas (excellent and good), while the chronological variables were predictive factors for corneas of regular and bad qualities. Conclusion: The identification of the factors inherent to the donation process and predictors of corneal tissue quality contribute to minimizing the risk of transplantation and to a better ocular prognosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Karinny Pereira Cruz & Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior & Oleci Pereira Frota & Elen Ferraz Teston & Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos & Allyne Fortes Vitor & Mayk Penza Cardoso & Fábio Rogério Ro, 2021. "Cornea donation process and tissue quality for transplantation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249927
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249927
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249927&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0249927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.