IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0249920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can predicting COVID-19 mortality in a European cohort using only demographic and comorbidity data surpass age-based prediction: An externally validated study

Author

Listed:
  • Avishek Chatterjee
  • Guangyao Wu
  • Sergey Primakov
  • Cary Oberije
  • Henry Woodruff
  • Pieter Kubben
  • Ronald Henry
  • Marcel J H Aries
  • Martijn Beudel
  • Peter G Noordzij
  • Tom Dormans
  • Niels C Gritters van den Oever
  • Joop P van den Bergh
  • Caroline E Wyers
  • Suat Simsek
  • Renée Douma
  • Auke C Reidinga
  • Martijn D de Kruif
  • Julien Guiot
  • Anne-Noelle Frix
  • Renaud Louis
  • Michel Moutschen
  • Pierre Lovinfosse
  • Philippe Lambin

Abstract

Objective: To establish whether one can build a mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients based solely on demographics and comorbidity data that outperforms age alone. Such a model could be a precursor to implementing smart lockdowns and vaccine distribution strategies. Methods: The training cohort comprised 2337 COVID-19 inpatients from nine hospitals in The Netherlands. The clinical outcome was death within 21 days of being discharged. The features were derived from electronic health records collected during admission. Three feature selection methods were used: LASSO, univariate using a novel metric, and pairwise (age being half of each pair). 478 patients from Belgium were used to test the model. All modeling attempts were compared against an age-only model. Results: In the training cohort, the mortality group’s median age was 77 years (interquartile range = 70–83), higher than the non-mortality group (median = 65, IQR = 55–75). The incidence of former/active smokers, male gender, hypertension, diabetes, dementia, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cardiac disease, chronic neurological disease, and chronic kidney disease was higher in the mortality group. All stated differences were statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. LASSO selected eight features, novel univariate chose five, and pairwise chose none. No model was able to surpass an age-only model in the external validation set, where age had an AUC of 0.85 and a balanced accuracy of 0.77. Conclusion: When applied to an external validation set, we found that an age-only mortality model outperformed all modeling attempts (curated on www.covid19risk.ai) using three feature selection methods on 22 demographic and comorbid features.

Suggested Citation

  • Avishek Chatterjee & Guangyao Wu & Sergey Primakov & Cary Oberije & Henry Woodruff & Pieter Kubben & Ronald Henry & Marcel J H Aries & Martijn Beudel & Peter G Noordzij & Tom Dormans & Niels C Gritter, 2021. "Can predicting COVID-19 mortality in a European cohort using only demographic and comorbidity data surpass age-based prediction: An externally validated study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249920
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249920
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249920&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0249920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.