IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0248922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partnering bevacizumab with irinotecan as first line-therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer improves progression free survival-A retrospective analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Calin Cainap
  • Rodica Ana Ungur
  • Ovidiu-Vasile Bochis
  • Patriciu Achimas
  • Catalin Vlad
  • Andrei Havasi
  • Andreea Vidrean
  • Anca Farcas
  • Tiberiu Tat
  • Alexandra Gherman
  • Andra Piciu
  • Madalina Bota
  • Anne-Marie Constantin
  • Laura Ancuta Pop
  • Dana Maniu
  • Ovidiu Crisan
  • Cosmin Vasile Cioban
  • Ovidiu Balacescu
  • Ovidiu Coza
  • Loredana Balacescu
  • Monica Mihaela Marta
  • Eleonora Dronca
  • Simona Cainap

Abstract

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most frequent malignancies (third place at both genders) worldwide in the last decade, owing to significant changes in modern dietary habits. Approximately half of the patients develop metastases during the course of their disease. The available therapeutic armamentarium is constantly evolving, raising questions regarding the best approach for improving survival. Bevacizumab remains one of the most widely used therapies for treating metastatic colorectal cancer and can be used after progression. This study aimed to identify the best chemotherapy partner for bevacizumab after progression. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with bevacizumab as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Data were collected for 151 patients, 40 of whom were treated with double-dose bevacizumab after the first progression. The two standard chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab were FOLFIRI/CAPIRI and FOLFOX4/CAPEOX. The initiation of first-line treatment with irinotecan-based chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and time to treatment failure but not overall survival. After the first progression, retreatment with the same regimen as that used in the induction phase was the best approach for improving overall survival (median overall survival: 46.5 vs. 27.0 months for the same vs. switched strategy, respectively). No correlations were observed between the dose intensity of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or bevacizumab and the overall survival, progression-free survival in the first-/second-line treatment, and time to treatment failure. Interaction between an irinotecan-based regimen as a second-line treatment and double-dose bevacizumab after progression was associated with an improved overall survival (p = 0.06). Initiating systemic treatment with an irinotecan-based regimen in combination with bevacizumab improved the progression-free survival in the first-line treatment and time to treatment failure. In terms of overall survival, bevacizumab treatment after the first progression is better partnered with the same regimen as that used in the induction phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Calin Cainap & Rodica Ana Ungur & Ovidiu-Vasile Bochis & Patriciu Achimas & Catalin Vlad & Andrei Havasi & Andreea Vidrean & Anca Farcas & Tiberiu Tat & Alexandra Gherman & Andra Piciu & Madalina Bota, 2021. "Partnering bevacizumab with irinotecan as first line-therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer improves progression free survival-A retrospective analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248922
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248922&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0248922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.