IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0247667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Q A Abdullah
  • Jana V Roedler
  • Juergen vom Dahl
  • Istvan Szendey
  • Hendrik Haake
  • Lars Eckardt
  • Albert Topf
  • Bernhard Ohnewein
  • Peter Jirak
  • Lukas J Motloch
  • Bernhard Wernly
  • Robert Larbig

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock could benefit from ventricular assist device support using the Impella microaxial blood pump. However, recent studies suggested Impella not to improve outcomes. We, therefore, evaluated outcomes and predictors in a real-world scenario. Methods: In this retrospective single-center trial, 125 patients suffering from cardiac arrest/cardiogenic shock between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. 93 Patients had a prior successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Associations of covariates with the primary endpoint were assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and optimal cut-offs (using Youden index) were obtained. Results: Hospital mortality was high (81%). Baseline lactate was 4.7mmol/L [IQR = 7.1mmol/L]. In multivariable logistic regression, only age (aOR 1.13 95%CI 1.06–1.20; p 3.3mmol/L and age >66 years. Conclusion: Mortality was high in this real-world collective of severely ill cardiogenic shock patients. Better patient selection is warranted to avoid unethical use of Impella. Age and lactate might help to improve patient selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Q A Abdullah & Jana V Roedler & Juergen vom Dahl & Istvan Szendey & Hendrik Haake & Lars Eckardt & Albert Topf & Bernhard Ohnewein & Peter Jirak & Lukas J Motloch & Bernhard Wernly & Robert Lar, 2021. "Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247667
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247667
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247667&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0247667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.