IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A randomised experiment of health, cost and social norm message frames to encourage acceptance of swaps in a simulation online supermarket

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Bunten
  • Lucy Porter
  • Jet G Sanders
  • Anna Sallis
  • Sarah Payne Riches
  • Paul Van Schaik
  • Marta González-Iraizoz
  • Tim Chadborn
  • Suzanna Forwood

Abstract

Offering lower-energy food swaps to customers of online supermarkets could help to decrease energy (kcal) purchased and consumed. However, acceptance rates of such food swaps tend to be low. This study aimed to see whether framing lower-energy food swaps in terms of cost savings or social norms could improve likelihood of acceptance relative to framing swaps in terms of health benefits. Participants (n = 900) were asked to shop from a 12-item shopping list in a simulation online supermarket. When a target high-energy food was identified in the shopping basket at check-out, one or two lower-energy foods would be suggested as an alternative (a “swap”). Participants were randomised to only see messages emphasising health benefits (fewer calories), cost benefits (lower price) or social norms (others preferred this product). Data were analysed for 713 participants after exclusions. Participants were offered a mean of 3.17 swaps (SD = 1.50), and 12.91% of swaps were accepted (health = 14.31%, cost = 11.49%, social norms = 13.18%). Swap acceptance was not influenced by the specific swap frame used (all p > .170). Age was significantly and positively associated with swap acceptance (b = 0.02, SE = 0.00, p

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Bunten & Lucy Porter & Jet G Sanders & Anna Sallis & Sarah Payne Riches & Paul Van Schaik & Marta González-Iraizoz & Tim Chadborn & Suzanna Forwood, 2021. "A randomised experiment of health, cost and social norm message frames to encourage acceptance of swaps in a simulation online supermarket," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246455
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246455&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.