IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0245990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing approach behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in Buridan’s paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Han
  • Tzu-Min Wei
  • Szu-Chiao Tseng
  • Chung-Chuan Lo

Abstract

The Buridan’s paradigm is a behavioral task designed for testing visuomotor responses or phototaxis in fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. In the task, a wing-shortened fruit fly freely moves on a round platform surrounded by a 360° white screen with two vertical black stripes placed at 0° and 180°. A normal fly will tend to approach the stripes one at a time and move back and forth between them. A variety of tasks developed based on the Buridan’s paradigm were designed to test other cognitive functions such as visual spatial memory. Although the movement patterns and the behavioral preferences of the flies in the Buridan’s or similar tasks have been extensively studies a few decades ago, the protocol and experimental settings are markedly different from what are used today. We revisited the Buridan’s paradigm and systematically investigated the approach behavior of fruit flies under different stimulus settings. While early studies revealed an edge-fixation behavior for a wide stripe in the initial visuomotor responses, we did not discover such tendency in the Buridan’s paradigm when observing a longer-term behavior up to minutes, a memory-task relevant time scale. Instead, we observed robust negative photoaxis in which the flies approached the central part of the dark stripes of all sizes. In addition, we found that stripes of 20°-30° width yielded the best performance of approach. We further varied the luminance of the stripes and the background screen, and discovered that the performance depended on the luminance ratio between the stripes and the screen. Our study provided useful information for designing and optimizing the Buridan’s paradigm and other behavioral tasks that utilize the approach behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Han & Tzu-Min Wei & Szu-Chiao Tseng & Chung-Chuan Lo, 2021. "Characterizing approach behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in Buridan’s paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245990
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245990
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245990&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0245990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsa Neuser & Tilman Triphan & Markus Mronz & Burkhard Poeck & Roland Strauss, 2008. "Analysis of a spatial orientation memory in Drosophila," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7199), pages 1244-1247, June.
    2. Julien Colomb & Lutz Reiter & Jedrzej Blaszkiewicz & Jan Wessnitzer & Bjoern Brembs, 2012. "Open Source Tracking and Analysis of Adult Drosophila Locomotion in Buridan's Paradigm with and without Visual Targets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chengfeng Xiao & R Meldrum Robertson, 2015. "Locomotion Induced by Spatial Restriction in Adult Drosophila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.