IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0244989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a simplified risk prediction model using a cloud based critical care registry in a lower-middle income country

Author

Listed:
  • Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan
  • Dilanthi Priyadarshini
  • Aasiyah Rashan
  • Abi Beane
  • Ramesh Venkataraman
  • Nagarajan Ramakrishnan
  • Rashan Haniffa
  • the Indian Registry of IntenSive care(IRIS) collaborators

Abstract

Background: The use of severity of illness scoring systems such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation in lower-middle income settings comes with important limitations, primarily due to data burden, missingness of key variables and lack of resources. To overcome these challenges, in Asia, a simplified model, designated as e-TropICS was previously developed. We sought to externally validate this model using data from a multi-centre critical care registry in India. Methods: Seven ICUs from the Indian Registry of IntenSive care(IRIS) contributed data to this study. Patients > 18 years of age with an ICU length of stay > 6 hours were included. Data including age, gender, co-morbidity, diagnostic category, type of admission, vital signs, laboratory measurements and outcomes were collected for all admissions. e-TropICS was calculated as per original methods. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to express the model’s power to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. For all tests of significance, a 2-sided P less than or equal to 0.05 was considered to be significant. AUROC values were considered poor when ≤ to 0.70, adequate between 0.71 to 0.80, good between 0.81 to 0.90, and excellent at 0.91 or higher. Calibration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow C -statistic. Results: We included data from 2062 consecutive patient episodes. The median age of the cohort was 60 and predominantly male (n = 1350, 65.47%). Mechanical Ventilation and vasopressors were administered at admission in 504 (24.44%) and 423 (20.51%) patients respectively. Overall, mortality at ICU discharge was 10.28% (n = 212). Discrimination (AUC) for the e-TropICS model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.812–0.839) with an HL C statistic p value of

Suggested Citation

  • Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan & Dilanthi Priyadarshini & Aasiyah Rashan & Abi Beane & Ramesh Venkataraman & Nagarajan Ramakrishnan & Rashan Haniffa & the Indian Registry of IntenSive care(I, 2020. "Validation of a simplified risk prediction model using a cloud based critical care registry in a lower-middle income country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0244989
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244989&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0244989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0244989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.