IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0244338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with self-reported burnout level in allied healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Hao Teo
  • Jordan Thet Ke Xu
  • Cowan Ho
  • Jui Min Leong
  • Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan
  • Elisabeth Ker Hsuen Tan
  • Wei-An Goh
  • Elson Neo
  • Jonathan Yu Jing Chua
  • Sean Jun Yi Ng
  • Julia Jie Yi Cheong
  • Jeff Yi-Fu Hwang
  • See Ming Lim
  • Thomas Soo
  • Judy Gek Khim Sng
  • Siyan Yi

Abstract

Background: Burnout has adverse implications in healthcare settings, compromising patient care. Allied health professionals (AHPs) are defined as individuals who work collaboratively to deliver routine and essential healthcare services, excluding physicians and nurses. There is a lack of studies on burnout among AHPs in Singapore. This study explored factors associated with a self-reported burnout level and barriers to seeking psychological help among AHPs in Singapore. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of AHPs in a tertiary hospital from October to December 2019. We emailed a four-component survey to 1127 eligible participants. The survey comprised four components: (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS), (3) Areas of Worklife Survey, and (4) Perceived Barriers to Psychological Treatment (PBPT). We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with burnout. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Results: In total, 328 participants completed the questionnaire. The self-reported burnout level (emotional exhaustion>27 and/or depersonalization>10) was 67.4%. The majority of the respondents were female (83.9%), Singaporean (73.5%), aged 40 years and below (84.2%), and Chinese ethnicity (79.9%). In the multiple logistic regression model, high burnout level was negatively associated with being in the age groups of 31 to 40 (AOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.93) and 40 years and older (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10–0.87) and a low self-reported workload (AOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23–0.52). High burnout level was positively associated with a work experience of three to five years (AOR 5.27, 95% CI 1.44–20.93) and more than five years (AOR 4.24; 95% CI 1.16–16.79. One hundred and ninety participants completed the PBPT component. The most frequently cited barriers to seeking psychological help by participants with burnout (n = 130) were ‘negative evaluation of therapy’ and ‘time constraints.’ Conclusions: This study shows a high self-reported burnout level and identifies its associated factors among AHPs in a tertiary hospital. The findings revealed the urgency of addressing burnout in AHPs and the need for effective interventions to reduce burnout. Concurrently, proper consideration of the barriers to seeking help is warranted to improve AHPs' mental well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Hao Teo & Jordan Thet Ke Xu & Cowan Ho & Jui Min Leong & Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan & Elisabeth Ker Hsuen Tan & Wei-An Goh & Elson Neo & Jonathan Yu Jing Chua & Sean Jun Yi Ng & Julia Jie Yi Cheong & Je, 2021. "Factors associated with self-reported burnout level in allied healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Singapore," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0244338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0244338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0244338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.