IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0241071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HIV drug resistance profile in South Africa: Findings and implications from the 2017 national HIV household survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sizulu Moyo
  • Gillian Hunt
  • Khangelani Zuma
  • Mpumi Zungu
  • Edmore Marinda
  • Musawenkosi Mabaso
  • Vibha Kana
  • Monalisa Kalimashe
  • Johanna Ledwaba
  • Inbarani Naidoo
  • Sinovuyo Takatshana
  • Tebogo Matjokotja
  • Cheryl Dietrich
  • Elliot Raizes
  • Karidia Diallo
  • Gurpreet Kindra
  • Linnetie Mugore
  • Thomas Rehle

Abstract

Background: HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing was included in the 2017 South African national HIV household survey. We describe the prevalence of HIVDR by drug class, age, sex and antiretroviral drugs (ARV) status. Methods: Dried blood were spots tested for HIV, with Viral load (VL), exposure to ARVs and HIVDR testing among those HIV positive. HIVDR testing was conducted on samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml using Next Generation Sequencing. Weighted percentages of HIVDR are reported. Results: 697/1,105 (63%) of HIV positive samples were sequenced. HIVDR was detected in samples from 200 respondents (27.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8–32.6)). Among these 130 (18.9% (95% CI 14.8–23.8)), had resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) only, 63 (7.8% (95% CI 5.6–10.9)) resistance to NNRTIs and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and 3 (0.5% (95% CI 0.1–2.1)) resistance to protease inhibitors. Sixty-five (55.7% (95% CI 42.6–67.9) of ARV-positive samples had HIVDR compared to 112 (22.8% (95% CI 17.7–28.7)), in ARV-negative samples. HIVDR was found in 75.6% (95% CI 59.2–87.3), n = 27, samples from respondents who reported ARV use but tested ARV-negative, and in 15.3% (95% CI 6.3–32.8), n = 7, respondents who reported no ARV use and tested ARV-negative. There were no significant age and sex differences in HIVDR. Conclusion: 27% of virally unsuppressed respondents had HIVDR, increasing to 75% among those who had discontinued ARV. Our findings support strengthening first-line ARV regimens by including drugs with a higher resistance barrier and treatment adherence strategies, and close monitoring of HIVDR.

Suggested Citation

  • Sizulu Moyo & Gillian Hunt & Khangelani Zuma & Mpumi Zungu & Edmore Marinda & Musawenkosi Mabaso & Vibha Kana & Monalisa Kalimashe & Johanna Ledwaba & Inbarani Naidoo & Sinovuyo Takatshana & Tebogo Ma, 2020. "HIV drug resistance profile in South Africa: Findings and implications from the 2017 national HIV household survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241071
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241071&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0241071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.