IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of an innovative medical device for improving oral accessibility during oral examination in special-needs patients: A multicentric clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Mogenot
  • Laurence Hein-Halbgewachs
  • Christophe Goetz
  • Nadia Ouamara
  • Dominique Droz-Desprez
  • Catherine Strazielle
  • Sylvie Albecker
  • Brigitte Mengus
  • Marion Strub
  • Marie-Cécile Manière
  • Pascal Richardin
  • Stéphane Wang
  • Giuseppa Piga
  • Amélie Dalstein
  • Daniel Anastasio

Abstract

Background: People with special needs have high unmet oral healthcare needs, partly because dentists find it difficult to access their oral cavity. The Oral Accessibility Spatula aims to improve oral accessibility. This prospective multicenter interventional open-label non-randomized patient-self-controlled trial assessed the ability of the spatula to improve the oral accessibility of special-needs patients during dental examinations. Methods: The cohort was a convenience sample of minor and adult patients with special needs due to physical, intellectual, and/or behavioral disorders who underwent dental check-up/treatment in five French tertiary hospitals/private clinics in 2016–2018 and evinced some (Venham-Score = 2–4) but not complete (Venham-Score = 5) resistance to oral examination. After inclusion, patients underwent oral examination without the spatula and then immediately thereafter oral examination with the spatula. Primary outcome was Oral Accessibility Score (0–12 points; higher scores indicate visualization and probing of the tooth sectors). Secondary outcomes were patient toleration (change in Venham-Score relative to first examination), safety, and Examiner Satisfaction Score (0–10; low scores indicate unsatisfactory examination). Results: The 201 patients were mostly non-elderly adults (18–64 years, 65%) but also included children (21%), adolescents (11%), and aged patients (3%). One-quarter, half, and one-quarter had Venham-Score = 2, 3, and 4 at inclusion, respectively. The spatula significantly improved Oral Accessibility Score (4.8 to 10.8), Venham-Score (3.1 to 2.6), and Examiner Satisfaction Score (3.4 to 7.2) (all p

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Mogenot & Laurence Hein-Halbgewachs & Christophe Goetz & Nadia Ouamara & Dominique Droz-Desprez & Catherine Strazielle & Sylvie Albecker & Brigitte Mengus & Marion Strub & Marie-Cécile Manière, 2020. "Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of an innovative medical device for improving oral accessibility during oral examination in special-needs patients: A multicentric clinical trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239898
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239898
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239898&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.