IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High level of HIV false positives using EIA-based algorithm in survey: Importance of confirmatory testing

Author

Listed:
  • Ângelo do Rosário Augusto
  • Nnaemeka C Iriemenam
  • Luciana Kohatsu
  • Leonardo de Sousa
  • Cremildo Maueia
  • Christine Hara
  • Flora Mula
  • Gercio Cuamba
  • Imelda Chelene
  • Zainabo Langa
  • Nathaniel Lohman
  • Flavio Faife
  • Denise Giles
  • Acacio Jose Sabonete
  • Eduardo Samo Gudo
  • Ilesh Jani
  • Bharat S Parekh

Abstract

The Mozambique Indicators of Immunization, Malaria and HIV/AIDS (IMASIDA) survey was conducted in 2015 and used a two Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Vironostika HIV-1/2 and Murex HIV-1/2) based algorithm to determine the HIV status of the consented participants. The Mozambique Ministry of Health, with support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC), added Bio-Rad Geenius™ HIV-1/2 Supplemental Assay to the IMASIDA HIV testing algorithm to confirm all specimens that were found to be reactive on one or both EIAs. In total 11690 specimens were collected to estimate the proportion of HIV positive samples. Results indicate that the proportion of HIV positive samples based on the concordant positive results of two EIA assays was 21.5% (2518/11690). The addition of the Geenius assay to the IMASIDA HIV testing algorithm demonstrated that 792 (31.5%) of 2518 specimens were false-positive and reduced the proportion of HIV positive samples to 14.7% (1722/11690), demonstrating the importance of including a highly specific HIV test to confirm HIV diagnosis. HIV surveys exclusively based on EIA testing algorithm may result in misleading high prevalence results. Our results demonstrate that more specific confirmatory testing should be added to the EIA-based algorithms to ensure accurate HIV diagnosis and correct HIV prevalence estimate in cross-sectional surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Ângelo do Rosário Augusto & Nnaemeka C Iriemenam & Luciana Kohatsu & Leonardo de Sousa & Cremildo Maueia & Christine Hara & Flora Mula & Gercio Cuamba & Imelda Chelene & Zainabo Langa & Nathaniel Lohm, 2020. "High level of HIV false positives using EIA-based algorithm in survey: Importance of confirmatory testing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239782
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239782
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239782&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.