IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducibility across single-cell RNA-seq protocols for spatial ordering analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Morten Seirup
  • Li-Fang Chu
  • Srikumar Sengupta
  • Ning Leng
  • Hadley Browder
  • Kevin Kapadia
  • Christina M Shafer
  • Bret Duffin
  • Angela L Elwell
  • Jennifer M Bolin
  • Scott Swanson
  • Ron Stewart
  • Christina Kendziorski
  • James A Thomson
  • Rhonda Bacher

Abstract

As newer single-cell protocols generate increasingly more cells at reduced sequencing depths, the value of a higher read depth may be overlooked. Using data from three different single-cell RNA-seq protocols that lend themselves to having either higher read depth (Smart-seq) or many cells (MARS-seq and 10X), we evaluate their ability to recapitulate biological signals in the context of spatial reconstruction. Overall, we find gene expression profiles after spatial reconstruction analysis are highly reproducible between datasets despite being generated by different protocols and using different computational algorithms. While UMI-based protocols such as 10X and MARS-seq allow for capturing more cells, Smart-seq’s higher sensitivity and read-depth allow for analysis of lower expressed genes and isoforms. Additionally, we evaluate trade-offs for each protocol by performing subsampling analyses and find that optimizing the balance between sequencing depth and number of cells within a protocol is necessary for efficient use of resources. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of selecting a protocol based on the biological questions and features of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Morten Seirup & Li-Fang Chu & Srikumar Sengupta & Ning Leng & Hadley Browder & Kevin Kapadia & Christina M Shafer & Bret Duffin & Angela L Elwell & Jennifer M Bolin & Scott Swanson & Ron Stewart & Chr, 2020. "Reproducibility across single-cell RNA-seq protocols for spatial ordering analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239711
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239711
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239711&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.