IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A semi-automated method for unbiased alveolar morphometry: Validation in a bronchopulmonary dysplasia model

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Salaets
  • Bieke Tack
  • André Gie
  • Benjamin Pavie
  • Nikhil Sindhwani
  • Julio Jimenez
  • Yannick Regin
  • Karel Allegaert
  • Jan Deprest
  • Jaan Toelen

Abstract

Reproducible and unbiased methods to quantify alveolar structure are important for research on many lung diseases. However, manually estimating alveolar structure through stereology is time consuming and inter-observer variability is high. The objective of this work was to develop and validate a fast, reproducible and accurate (semi-)automatic alternative. A FIJI-macro was designed that automatically segments lung images to binary masks, and counts the number of test points falling on tissue and the number of intersections of the air-tissue interface with a set of test lines. Manual selection remains necessary for the recognition of non-parenchymal tissue and alveolar exudates. Volume density of alveolar septa (VVsep) and mean linear intercept of the airspaces (Lm) as measured by the macro were compared to theoretical values for 11 artificial test images and to manually counted values for 17 lungs slides using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. Inter-observer agreement between 3 observers, measuring 8 lungs both manually and automatically, was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). VVsep and Lm measured by the macro closely approached theoretical values for artificial test images (R2 of 0.9750 and 0.9573 and bias of 0.34% and 8.7%). The macro data in lungs were slightly higher for VVsep and slightly lower for Lm in comparison to manually counted values (R2 of 0.8262 and 0.8288 and bias of -6.0% and 12.1%). Visually, semi-automatic segmentation was accurate. Most importantly, manually counted VVsep and Lm had only moderate to good inter-observer agreement (ICC 0.859 and 0.643), but agreements were excellent for semi-automatically counted values (ICC 0.956 and 0.900). This semi-automatic method provides accurate and highly reproducible alveolar morphometry results. Future efforts should focus on refining methods for automatic detection of non-parenchymal tissue or exudates, and for assessment of lung structure on 3D reconstructions of lungs scanned with microCT.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Salaets & Bieke Tack & André Gie & Benjamin Pavie & Nikhil Sindhwani & Julio Jimenez & Yannick Regin & Karel Allegaert & Jan Deprest & Jaan Toelen, 2020. "A semi-automated method for unbiased alveolar morphometry: Validation in a bronchopulmonary dysplasia model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239562
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239562
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239562&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard E Jacob & James P Carson & Kathy M Gideon & Brett G Amidan & Cathie L Smith & K Monica Lee, 2009. "Comparison of Two Quantitative Methods of Discerning Airspace Enlargement in Smoke-Exposed Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-7, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.