IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Liangjun Zhao
  • Fang Xu
  • Shan Lao
  • Jingmin Zhao
  • Qingjun Wei

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty separately to determine whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty can provide better lower extremity radiographic results and clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched literatures to identify relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of computer-assisted and traditional methods in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. After screening, quality evaluation and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality and bias risks of the included studies were evaluated. The meta-analysis compared the radiographic results, functional outcomes and complications of the two techniques. Results: Six clinical controlled trials were included, with total of 1098 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the accuracy in terms of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal alignment of the tibial component in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty was significantly better than those in traditional total knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in the functional results, revision rates or aseptic loosening rates between the two techniques. Conclusion: After excluding individual differences such as bone development and bone quality, although computer-assisted techniques can better accurately correct the mechanical axis of the lower extremity and the position of prosthesis implantation than traditional techniques, there is no significant difference in the functional results and revision rate of bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the same individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangjun Zhao & Fang Xu & Shan Lao & Jingmin Zhao & Qingjun Wei, 2020. "Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239341
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239341
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239341&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.