IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of smoking on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abay Burusie
  • Fikre Enquesilassie
  • Adamu Addissie
  • Berhe Dessalegn
  • Tafesse Lamaro

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous studies have explored an effect of cigarette smoking on tuberculosis treatment outcomes but with dissimilar conclusions. Objective: To determine the effect of cigarette smoking on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane library and Google scholar databases were searched last on February 27, 2019. We applied the random-effects model for the analysis. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Egger’s regression. Furthermore, we performed Orwin’s Fail-Safe N and cumulative meta-analysis to check for small studies’ effect. Results: Out of 22 studies we included in the qualitative synthesis, 12 studies reported p-values less than 0.05 where smoking significantly favored poor treatment outcomes. The remaining 10 studies reported p-values larger than 0.05 implying that smoking does not affect the treatment outcomes. Twenty studies met the criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found that smoking significantly increased the likelihood of poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes by 51% (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.30 to 1.75 and I-square = 75.1%). In a sub-group analysis, the effect was higher for low- and middle-income countries (OR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.31 to 2.30) and upper-middle-income economies (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.98) than for high-income ones (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.75) even though the differences in the effects among the strata were not statistically significant as demonstrated by overlapping of confidence intervals of the effects. Meta-regression analysis, adjusted for income economies, found the effect of smoking has not significantly improved over the years (p = 0.92) and thus implying neither of the covariates were source of the heterogeneity. Egger’s regression test indicated that publication bias is unlikely (p = 0.403). Conclusion: Cigarette smoking is significantly linked with poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abay Burusie & Fikre Enquesilassie & Adamu Addissie & Berhe Dessalegn & Tafesse Lamaro, 2020. "Effect of smoking on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239333
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239333&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.