IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics and outcomes of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans: A systematic review and series of meta-analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento
  • Thilo Caspar von Groote
  • Dónal P O’Mathúna
  • Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem
  • Catherine Henderson
  • Umesh Jayarajah
  • Ishanka Weerasekara
  • Tina Poklepovic Pericic
  • Henning Edgar Gerald Klapproth
  • Livia Puljak
  • Nensi Cacic
  • Irena Zakarija-Grkovic
  • Silvana Mangeon Meirelles Guimarães
  • Alvaro Nagib Atallah
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
  • Milena Soriano Marcolino
  • Ana Marusic
  • Ana Jeroncic
  • On behalf of the International Task Force Network of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (InterNetCOVID-19)

Abstract

New evidence on the COVID-19 pandemic is being published daily. Ongoing high-quality assessment of this literature is therefore needed to enable clinical practice to be evidence-based. This review builds on a previous scoping review and aimed to identify associations between disease severity and various clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Scopus and LILACS for studies published between January 1, 2019 and March 22, 2020. Clinical studies including ≥10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 of any study design were eligible. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A quality effects model was used for the meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity. For hospitalized patients, studies were ordered by overall disease severity of each population and this order was used as the modifier variable in meta-regression. Overall, 86 studies (n = 91,621) contributed data to the meta-analyses. Severe disease was strongly associated with fever, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, any computed tomography findings, any ground glass opacity, lymphocytopenia, elevated C-reactive protein, elevated alanine aminotransferase, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, older age and male sex. These variables typically increased in prevalence by 30–73% from mild/early disease through to moderate/severe disease. Among hospitalized patients, 30–78% of heterogeneity was explained by severity of disease. Elevated white blood cell count was strongly associated with more severe disease among moderate/severe hospitalized patients. Elevated lymphocytes, low platelets, interleukin-6, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and D-dimers showed potential associations, while fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, consolidation and septal thickening showed non-linear association patterns. Headache and sore throat were associated with the presence of disease, but not with more severe disease. In COVID-19, more severe disease is strongly associated with several clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics. Symptoms and other variables in early/mild disease appear non-specific and highly heterogeneous.Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020170623.

Suggested Citation

  • Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento & Thilo Caspar von Groote & Dónal P O’Mathúna & Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem & Catherine Henderson & Umesh Jayarajah & Ishanka Weerasekara & Tina Poklepovic Pericic, 2020. "Clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics and outcomes of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans: A systematic review and series of meta-analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-35, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.