IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of clinical decision rules for traumatic intracranial injuries in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in a developing country

Author

Listed:
  • Tanat Vaniyapong
  • Phichayut Phinyo
  • Jayanton Patumanond
  • Sanguansin Ratanalert
  • Kriengsak Limpastan

Abstract

Background: The majority of clinical decision rules for prediction of intracranial injury in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) were developed from high-income countries. The application of these rules in low or middle-income countries, where the primary mechanism of injury was traffic accidents, is questionable. Methods: We developed two practical decision rules from a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1,164 patients with mild TBI who visited the emergency departments from 2013 to 2016. The clinical endpoints were the presence of any intracranial injury on CT scans and the requirement of neurosurgical interventions within seven days of onset. Results: Thirteen predictors were included in both models, which were age ≥60 years, dangerous mechanism of injury, diffuse headache, vomiting >2 episodes, loss of consciousness, posttraumatic amnesia, posttraumatic seizure, history of anticoagulant use, presence of neurological deficits, significant wound at the scalp, signs of skull base fracture, palpable stepping at the skull, and GCS

Suggested Citation

  • Tanat Vaniyapong & Phichayut Phinyo & Jayanton Patumanond & Sanguansin Ratanalert & Kriengsak Limpastan, 2020. "Development of clinical decision rules for traumatic intracranial injuries in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239082
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239082
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239082&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.