IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nina B Masters
  • Shu-Fang Shih
  • Allen Bukoff
  • Kaitlyn B Akel
  • Lindsay C Kobayashi
  • Alison L Miller
  • Harapan Harapan
  • Yihan Lu
  • Abram L Wagner

Abstract

In order to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, much of the US was placed under social distancing guidelines during March 2020. We characterized risk perceptions and adherence to social distancing recommendations in March 2020 among US adults aged 18+ in an online survey with age and gender quotas to match the general US population (N = 713). We used multivariable logistic and linear regression to estimate associations between age (by generational cohort) and these outcomes. The median perceived risk of infection with COVID-19 within the next month was 32%, and 65% of individuals were practicing more social distancing than before the outbreak. Baby Boomers had lower perceived risk than Millennials (-10.6%, 95% CI: -16.2%, -5.0%), yet were more frequently social distancing (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.56). Public health outreach should focus on raising compliance with social distancing recommendations, especially among high risk groups. Efforts to address risk perceptions alone may be inadequate.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina B Masters & Shu-Fang Shih & Allen Bukoff & Kaitlyn B Akel & Lindsay C Kobayashi & Alison L Miller & Harapan Harapan & Yihan Lu & Abram L Wagner, 2020. "Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.