IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0238712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing patient-reported outcomes in veterans with cirrhosis

Author

Listed:
  • Shari S Rogal
  • Vera Yakovchenko
  • Rachel Gonzalez
  • Angela Park
  • Carolyn Lamorte
  • Sandra P Gibson
  • Maggie Chartier
  • David Ross
  • Emily Comstock
  • Jasmohan S Bajaj
  • Timothy R Morgan

Abstract

Background and aims: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) cares for over 80,000 Veterans with cirrhosis annually. Given the importance of understanding patient reported outcomes in this complex population, we aimed to assess the associations between attitudes towards care, disease knowledge, and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in a national sample. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we mailed paper surveys to a random sample of Veterans with cirrhosis, oversampling those with decompensated disease. Surveys included the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (measuring HRQoL) and questions about demographics, characteristics of care, satisfaction with care (“attitudes towards care”), and symptoms of cirrhosis. Those who reported being “unsure” about whether they had decompensation events were defined as “unsure about cirrhosis symptoms” (“disease knowledge”). We used multivariable regression models to assess the factors associated with HRQoL. Results: Of 1374 surveys, 551 (40%) completed surveys were included for analysis. Most Veterans (63%) were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with VA liver care. Patients often self-reported being unsure about whether they had experienced hepatic decompensation events (34%). Overall average physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores of HRQoL were 30±11 and 41±12. In multivariable regression models, hepatic decompensation (PCS:β = -3.8, MCS:β = -2.2), medical comorbidities (β = −-2.0, β = -1.7), and being unsure about cirrhosis symptoms (β = -1.9, β = -3.3) were associated with worse HRQoL, while age (β = 0.1, β = 0.2) and satisfaction with care (β = 0.6; β = 1.6) were associated with significantly better HRQoL. Conclusions: Hepatic decompensation, lower satisfaction with care, and being unsure about cirrhosis symptoms were associated with reduced QOL scores in this national cohort.

Suggested Citation

  • Shari S Rogal & Vera Yakovchenko & Rachel Gonzalez & Angela Park & Carolyn Lamorte & Sandra P Gibson & Maggie Chartier & David Ross & Emily Comstock & Jasmohan S Bajaj & Timothy R Morgan, 2020. "Characterizing patient-reported outcomes in veterans with cirrhosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238712
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238712&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0238712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.