IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0238043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CA125 in relation to pain symptoms among adolescents and young adult women with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis

Author

Listed:
  • Naoko Sasamoto
  • Mary DePari
  • Allison F Vitonis
  • Marc R Laufer
  • Stacey A Missmer
  • Amy L Shafrir
  • Kathryn L Terry

Abstract

Endometriosis is a painful gynecologic disease affecting one in ten reproductive aged women worldwide. Few studies have correlated this symptomatology with biomarker levels among women with and without endometriosis, and no studies correlating pain with biomarker levels have been performed in young patient populations. The purpose of this study was to examine whether CA125 correlates with different types and severity of pain among adolescents and young women with and without endometriosis and assess its performance as an endometriosis biomarker among those presenting with dysmenorrhea in this young population. Reproductive-aged women with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis (n = 282) and controls (n = 293) who participated in The Women’s Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A), a cohort of adolescents and young women enrolled from 2012–2018, were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Plasma CA125 values were measured using WERF EPHect compliant blood samples collected at enrollment. Average CA125 were calculated by self-reported pain type (i.e. dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic/general pelvic pain, dyspareunia), severity, and frequency in endometriosis cases and controls. Median age at blood draw was 24 years in controls and 17 years in cases, with 68% and 89% non-Hispanic white, respectively. Most endometriosis cases (95%) were rASRM stage I/II. Average CA125 values were 12.5 U/mL in controls and 12.1 U/mL in cases adjusted for age. CA125 did not differ by pain type, its severity, or frequency in endometriosis cases or controls. Among participants who reported dysmenorrhea, CA125 did not discriminate endometriosis cases from controls using cutoff of 35 U/mL (AUC = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.50–0.53). Among adolescents and young adult women, CA125 did not correlate with pain type. CA125 did not efficiently discriminate endometriosis cases from controls even when accounting for pain symptomatology. Average CA125 values were low in adolescents and young women in both endometriosis cases and controls, suggesting cautious interpretation may be needed when measuring CA125 in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoko Sasamoto & Mary DePari & Allison F Vitonis & Marc R Laufer & Stacey A Missmer & Amy L Shafrir & Kathryn L Terry, 2020. "Evaluation of CA125 in relation to pain symptoms among adolescents and young adult women with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238043
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238043&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0238043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.