IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards reporting guidelines of research using whole-body vibration as training or treatment regimen in human subjects—A Delphi consensus study

Author

Listed:
  • Anika Wuestefeld
  • Anselm B M Fuermaier
  • Mario Bernardo-Filho
  • Danúbia da Cunha de Sá-Caputo
  • Jörn Rittweger
  • Eckhard Schoenau
  • Christina Stark
  • Pedro J Marin
  • Adérito Seixas
  • Stefan Judex
  • Redha Taiar
  • Csaba Nyakas
  • Eddy A van der Zee
  • Marieke J G van Heuvelen
  • Oliver Tucha

Abstract

Background: Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a method utilizing vibrating platforms to expose individuals to mechanical vibration. In its various applications, it has been linked to improved muscular, skeletal, metabolic, or cognitive functioning, quality of life, and physiological parameters such as blood pressure. Most evidence concerning WBV is inconclusive and meta-analytical reviews may not readily produce insights since the research has a risk of misunderstandings of vibration parameters and incomplete reporting occurs. This study aims at laying an empirical foundation for reporting guidelines for human WBV studies to improve the quality of reporting and the currently limited comparability between studies. Method: The Delphi methodology is employed to exploit the integrated knowledge of WBV experts to distil the specific aspects of WBV methodology that should be included in such guidelines. Over three rounds of completing online questionnaires, the expert panel (round 1/2/3: 51/40/37 experts respectively from 17 countries with an average of 19.4 years of WBV research experience) rated candidate items. Results: A 40-item list was established based on the ratings of the individual items from the expert panel with a large final consensus (94.6%). Conclusion: The final consensus indicates comprehensiveness and valuableness of the list. The results are in line with previous guidelines but expand these extensively. The present results may therefore serve as a foundation for updated guidelines for reporting human WBV studies in order to improve the quality of reporting of WBV studies, improve comparability of studies and facilitate the development of WBV study designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Anika Wuestefeld & Anselm B M Fuermaier & Mario Bernardo-Filho & Danúbia da Cunha de Sá-Caputo & Jörn Rittweger & Eckhard Schoenau & Christina Stark & Pedro J Marin & Adérito Seixas & Stefan Judex & R, 2020. "Towards reporting guidelines of research using whole-body vibration as training or treatment regimen in human subjects—A Delphi consensus study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235905
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235905
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235905&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.