IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Describing the status of reproductive ageing simply and precisely: A reproductive ageing score based on three questions and validated with hormone levels

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Triebner
  • Ane Johannessen
  • Cecilie Svanes
  • Bénédicte Leynaert
  • Bryndís Benediktsdóttir
  • Pascal Demoly
  • Shyamali C Dharmage
  • Karl A Franklin
  • Joachim Heinrich
  • Mathias Holm
  • Deborah Jarvis
  • Eva Lindberg
  • Jesús Martínez Moratalla Rovira
  • Nerea Muniozguren Agirre
  • José Luis Sánchez-Ramos
  • Vivi Schlünssen
  • Svein Magne Skulstad
  • Steinar Hustad
  • Francisco J Rodriguez
  • Francisco Gómez Real

Abstract

Objective: Most women live to experience menopause and will spend 4–8 years transitioning from fertile age to full menstrual stop. Biologically, reproductive ageing is a continuous process, but by convention, it is defined categorically as pre-, peri- and postmenopause; categories that are sometimes supported by measurements of sex hormones in blood samples. We aimed to develop and validate a new tool, a reproductive ageing score (RAS), that could give a simple and yet precise description of the status of reproductive ageing, without hormone measurements, to be used by health professionals and researchers. Methods: Questionnaire data on age, menstrual regularity and menstrual frequency was provided by the large multicentre population-based RHINE cohort. A continuous reproductive ageing score was developed from these variables, using techniques of fuzzy mathematics, to generate a decimal number ranging from 0.00 (nonmenopausal) to 1.00 (postmenopausal). The RAS was then validated with sex hormone measurements (follicle stimulating hormone and 17β-estradiol) and interview-data provided by the large population-based ECRHS cohort, using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC). Results: The RAS, developed from questionnaire data of the RHINE cohort, defined with high precision and accuracy the menopausal status as confirmed by interview and hormone data in the ECRHS cohort. The area under the ROC curve was 0.91 (95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.90–0.93) to distinguish nonmenopausal women from peri- and postmenopausal women, and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83–0.88) to distinguish postmenopausal women from nonmenopausal and perimenopausal women. Conclusions: The RAS provides a useful and valid tool for describing the status of reproductive ageing accurately, on a continuous scale from 0.00 to 1.00, based on simple questions and without requiring blood sampling. The score allows for a more precise differentiation than the conventional categorisation in pre-, peri- and postmenopause. This is useful for epidemiological research and clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Triebner & Ane Johannessen & Cecilie Svanes & Bénédicte Leynaert & Bryndís Benediktsdóttir & Pascal Demoly & Shyamali C Dharmage & Karl A Franklin & Joachim Heinrich & Mathias Holm & Deborah Jarvi, 2020. "Describing the status of reproductive ageing simply and precisely: A reproductive ageing score based on three questions and validated with hormone levels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235478
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235478
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235478&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.