IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tacrolimus trough levels higher than 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year in stable kidney transplant recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Hee-Yeon Jung
  • Min Young Seo
  • Yena Jeon
  • Kyu Ha Huh
  • Jae Berm Park
  • Cheol Woong Jung
  • Sik Lee
  • Seung-Yeup Han
  • Han Ro
  • Jaeseok Yang
  • Curie Ahn
  • Ji-Young Choi
  • Jang-Hee Cho
  • Sun-Hee Park
  • Yong-Lim Kim
  • Chan-Duck Kim

Abstract

Background: Little is known regarding optimal tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels after 1 year post-transplant in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who have not experienced renal or cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of 1-year post-transplant TAC trough levels on long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes and opportunistic infections in stable KTRs. Methods: KTRs receiving TAC with mycophenolate-based immunosuppression who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes within 1 year post-transplant were enrolled from a multicenter observational cohort study. Renal outcome was defined as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and death-censored graft loss. Cardiovascular outcome was defined as a composite of de novo cardiomegaly, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiovascular events. Opportunistic infections were defined as the occurrence of BK virus or cytomegalovirus infections. Results: A total of 603 eligible KTRs were divided into the low-level TAC (LL-TAC) and high-level TAC (HL-TAC) groups based on a median TAC level of 5.9 ng/mL (range 1.3–14.3) at 1 year post-transplant. The HL-TAC group had significantly higher TAC trough levels at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years compared with the levels of the LL-TAC group. During the mean follow-up of 63.7 ± 13.0 months, there were 121 renal outcomes and 224 cardiovascular outcomes. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, LL-TAC and HL-TAC were not independent risk factors for renal and cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. No significant differences in the development of opportunistic infections and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and renal allograft function were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: TAC trough levels after 1 year post-transplant remained at a similar level until the fifth year after kidney transplantation and were not directly associated with long-term outcomes in stable Korean KTRs who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, in Asian KTRs with a stable clinical course, TAC trough levels higher than approximately 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year of kidney transplantation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee-Yeon Jung & Min Young Seo & Yena Jeon & Kyu Ha Huh & Jae Berm Park & Cheol Woong Jung & Sik Lee & Seung-Yeup Han & Han Ro & Jaeseok Yang & Curie Ahn & Ji-Young Choi & Jang-Hee Cho & Sun-Hee Park &, 2020. "Tacrolimus trough levels higher than 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year in stable kidney transplant recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235418
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235418
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235418&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.