IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the implementation of an early supported discharge (ESD) program for stroke survivors: A mixed methods longitudinal case study

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Hitch
  • Kathleen Leech
  • Sharon Neale
  • Avetta Malcolm

Abstract

Background: Early supported discharge (ESD) models of care for stroke survivors coordinate inpatient and community services, with the aim of reducing length of stay. While there is an established evidence base around the clinical outcomes of ESD), less is known about the implementation of this approach into existing stroke care service. The aim of this case study was to describe staff perceptions of the implementation of an ESD model of care for stroke survivors at a large metropolitan public hospital in Australia. Methods: This case study utilised a mixed methods design, which was designed in explicit alignment with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants included staff that referred patients for ESD, and staff involved in the planning, implementation or delivery of ESD. Survey data was collected at three time points (ESD commencement, 3 months and 6 months), and focus groups were undertaken at the conclusion of the study. All quantitative data was analysed descriptive, while qualitative data was evaluated using thematic analysis. Results: Results from both sources of data identified changes in staff perceptions of ESD implementation over time. While very few changes were statistically significant, they were diverse patterns of change across the CFIR constructs over time. The characteristics of individuals and ESD characteristics attracted consistently positive perceptions, while patient needs and resources was the most prevalent theme within the data. While perceptions of factors related to the inner setting were mixed, there was a steady improvement in perceptions about the process across the later stages of implementation. Conclusions: The sophistication of knowledge translation and implementation in modern complex healthcare environments is highlighted by the multiple interactions between the CFIR domains and constructs. While the implementation process described was generally positive and effective, using the CFIR as a framework confirmed that it also entailed some challenges and unanticipated outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Hitch & Kathleen Leech & Sharon Neale & Avetta Malcolm, 2020. "Evaluating the implementation of an early supported discharge (ESD) program for stroke survivors: A mixed methods longitudinal case study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235055
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235055&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.