IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of excess pregnancy weight gain using psychological, physical, and social predictors: A validated model in a prospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah D McDonald
  • Zhijie Michael Yu
  • Sherry van Blyderveen
  • Louis Schmidt
  • Wendy Sword
  • Meredith Vanstone
  • Anne Biringer
  • Helen McDonald
  • Joseph Beyene

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a prediction model for excess pregnancy weight gain using early pregnancy factors. Design: Prospective cohort study Setting: We recruited from 12 obstetrical, family medicine, and midwifery centers in Ontario, Canada Participants: We recruited English-speaking women with singleton pregnancies between 8+0–20+6 weeks. Of 1296 women approached, 1050 were recruited (81%). Of those, 970 women had complete data (970/1050, 92%) and were recruited at a mean of 14.8 weeks. Primary outcome measure: We collected data on psychological, physical, and social factors and used stepwise logistic regression analysis to develop a multivariable model predicting our primary outcome of excess pregnancy weight gain, with random selection of 2/3 of women for training data and 1/3 for testing data. Results: Nine variables were included in the final model to predict excess pregnancy weight gain. These included nulliparity, being overweight, planning excessive gain, eating in front of a screen, low self-efficacy regarding pregnancy weight gain, thinking family or friends believe pregnant women should eat twice as much as before pregnancy, being agreeable, and having emotion control difficulties. Training and testing data yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.80) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.68), respectively. Conclusions: In this first validated prediction model in early pregnancy, we found that nine psychological, physical, and social factors moderately predicted excess pregnancy weight gain in the final model. This research highlights the importance of several predictors, including relatively easily modifiable ones such as appropriate weight gain plans and mindfulness during eating, and lays an important methodological foundation for other future prediction models.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah D McDonald & Zhijie Michael Yu & Sherry van Blyderveen & Louis Schmidt & Wendy Sword & Meredith Vanstone & Anne Biringer & Helen McDonald & Joseph Beyene, 2020. "Prediction of excess pregnancy weight gain using psychological, physical, and social predictors: A validated model in a prospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233774
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233774
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233774&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Rolińska & Anna Aftyka & Marzena Samardakiewicz, 2021. "Coping with Stress in Complicated Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.