IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical concepts in Arabic calligraphy: The proportions of the ʾAlif

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Ali Jalal Yaghan

Abstract

The starting point of every study on the proportions of Arabic calligraphy is the letter ʾAlif. It is considered the reference for all other letters. Usually, it is measured in dots. This paper is an attempt to study the mathematical concepts upon which the historical theory of the ʾAlif proportions was based, though not mathematically stated. In order to achieve this, the terms and components of the theory were clearly defined, and analyzed in their textual and visual context, historically, and logically according to our present time. In spite of the frequent use of these terms throughout time, their meanings were not always clear and can accept different interpretations. Some terms, even, indicated different meanings and were loosely used to satisfy different functions, for example, the term “Nuqṭah” (dot). Relating the components of the theory was, also, opened for opinions and interpretations, for example, the number of dots for the ʾAlif was never agreed upon. This paper starts with historical research and analysis. Then, it presents the mathematical expressions of the ʾAlif proportions both numerically and visually. Later, it discusses how they do apply, how other modern interpretations can fit, and how historical misunderstandings can be understood. Finally, it presents the historical account of how to relate other letters to the ʾAlif recommending analyzing their mathematical aspects in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Ali Jalal Yaghan, 2020. "Mathematical concepts in Arabic calligraphy: The proportions of the ʾAlif," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232641
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232641
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232641&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.