IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validating the Chinese geriatric trigger tool and analyzing adverse drug event associated risk factors in elderly Chinese patients: A retrospective review

Author

Listed:
  • Qiaozhi Hu
  • Zhou Qin
  • Mei Zhan
  • Zhaoyan Chen
  • Bin Wu
  • Ting Xu

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the performance of the initial Chinese geriatric trigger tool to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) in Chinese older patients, to attempt to shorten this list for improving the efficiency of the trigger tool, and to study the incidence and characteristics of ADEs in this population. Methods: A sample of 25 cases was randomly selected per half a month from eligible patients who aged 60 years and older, hospitalized more than 24 hours, and discharged or died between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 in West China hospital. A two-stage retrospective chart review of the included inpatients were conducted. ADEs were detected using a list of 42 triggers previously selected by an expert panel by means of a Delphi method. The number of triggers identified and ADEs detected were recorded and the positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger was calculated to select the most efficient triggers. Several variables were recorded, including age, sex, number of diseases, length of hospital stay and so on, to analyze the risk factor of ADEs. Results: Among 1800 patients, 1646 positive triggers and 296 ADEs were detected in 234 (13.00%) patients. Older patients who were younger, had more medications, longer stays or more admission, and did not experience surgical operation more likely experienced ADEs. Triggers with PPV less than 5% were eliminated, which resulted in the upgraded version of Chinese geriatric trigger tool of 20 triggers with a PPV of 28.50%. This upgraded tool accounted for 99.66% of all ADEs detected. Conclusions: The upgraded version of Chinese geriatric trigger tool was an efficient tool for identifying ADEs in Chinese older patients. Future, the trigger tool could be incorporated into routine screen systems to provide real-time identification of ADEs, thereby enabling timely clinical interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiaozhi Hu & Zhou Qin & Mei Zhan & Zhaoyan Chen & Bin Wu & Ting Xu, 2020. "Validating the Chinese geriatric trigger tool and analyzing adverse drug event associated risk factors in elderly Chinese patients: A retrospective review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232095
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232095&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.