IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in the association between socioeconomic status and hypertension in France: A cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Lola Neufcourt
  • Séverine Deguen
  • Sahar Bayat
  • Marie Zins
  • Olivier Grimaud

Abstract

Background: Hypertension prevalence increases when socioeconomic status decreases but gender differences in the relationship between socioeconomic status and hypertension have been less studied. This work aimed to explore the pattern of associations between three indicators of socioeconomic status at individual, household, and municipal levels with hypertension across genders in a large sample of French adults from the CONSTANCES cohort. Methods: Using data at inclusion from 59 805 participants (52% women) aged 25–69 years and recruited between 2012 and 2015, multilevel log-Poisson regressions with robust variance estimates were used to assess the associations of Relative Index of Inequality in education, monthly income per consumption unit and residential deprivation with hypertension. Modifying effects of gender and age in those associations were tested. Results: Hypertension prevalence was higher in men than in women. Steep socioeconomic gradients of hypertension were observed for the three socioeconomic indicators in both genders and from the youngest to the oldest age class. Socioeconomic inequalities, especially educational inequalities, were larger among women than men: Relative Index of Inequality for highest versus lowest education among the 25–34 years were 0.43 [95%-confidence interval = 0.28–0.67] in women and 0.70 [95%-confidence interval = 0.53–0.92] in men. With increasing age, socioeconomic gradients of hypertension eased in men and even more in women so that gender differences decreased. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional analysis of a large sample of adults, prevalence of hypertension was higher in men than in women. Moreover, socioeconomic status and especially education displayed a stronger association with hypertension prevalence in women compared to men. Reducing inequalities in hypertension may require gender-specific approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Lola Neufcourt & Séverine Deguen & Sahar Bayat & Marie Zins & Olivier Grimaud, 2020. "Gender differences in the association between socioeconomic status and hypertension in France: A cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231878
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231878&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yelland Lisa N & Salter Amy B & Ryan Philip, 2011. "Relative Risk Estimation in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Comparison of Methods for Independent Observations," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2020. "Optimal approximate conversions of odds ratios and hazard ratios to risk ratios," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 746-752, September.
    2. Yelland Lisa N & Salter Amy B & Ryan Philip, 2011. "Relative Risk Estimation in Cluster Randomized Trials: A Comparison of Generalized Estimating Equation Methods," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.