IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Emeka Chukwusa
  • Peihan Yu
  • Julia Verne
  • Ros Taylor
  • Irene J Higginson
  • Gao Wei

Abstract

Background: There is much variation in hospice use with respect to geographic factors such as area-based deprivation, location of patient’s residence and proximity to services location. However, little is known about how the association between geographic access to inpatient hospice and hospice deaths varies by patients’ region of settlement. Study aim: To examine regional differences in the association between geographic access to inpatient hospice and hospice deaths. Methods: A regional population-based observational study in England, UK. Records of patients aged ≥ 25 years (n = 123088) who died from non-accidental causes in 2014, were extracted from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registry. Our cohort comprised of patients who died at home and in inpatient hospice. Decedents were allocated to each of the nine government office regions of England (London, East Midlands, West Midlands, East, Yorkshire and The Humber, South West, South East, North West and North East) through record linkage with their postcode of usual residence. We defined geographic access as a measure of drive times from patients’ residential location to the nearest inpatient hospice. A modified Poisson regression estimated the association between geographic access to hospice, comparing hospice deaths (1) versus home deaths (0). We developed nine regional specific models and adjusted for regional differences in patient’s clinical & socio-demographic characteristics. The strength of the association was estimated with adjusted Proportional Ratios (aPRs). Findings: The percentage of deaths varied across regions (home: 86.7% in the North East to 73.0% in the South East; hospice: 13.3% in the North East to 27.0% in the South East). We found wide differences in geographic access to inpatient hospices across regions. Median drive times to hospice varied from 4.6 minutes in London to 25.9 minutes in the North East. We found a dose-response association in the East: (aPRs: 0.22–0.78); East Midlands: (aPRs: 0.33–0.63); North East (aPRs: 0.19–0.87); North West (aPRs: 0.69–0.88); South West (aPRs: 0.56–0.89) and West Midlands (aPRs: 0.28–0.92) indicating that decedents who lived further away from hospices locations (≥ 10 minutes) were less likely to die in a hospice. Conclusion: The clear dose-response associations in six regions underscore the importance of regional specific initiatives to improve and optimise access to hospices. Commissioners and policymakers need to do more to ensure that home death is not due to limited geographic access to inpatient hospice care.

Suggested Citation

  • Emeka Chukwusa & Peihan Yu & Julia Verne & Ros Taylor & Irene J Higginson & Gao Wei, 2020. "Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231666
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231666
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231666&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna M Davies & Katherine E Sleeman & Javiera Leniz & Rebecca Wilson & Irene J Higginson & Julia Verne & Matthew Maddocks & Fliss E M Murtagh, 2019. "Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongling Zhang & Guoqing Zhang & Yuxin Jiao & Yanyan Wang & Pengnian Wang, 2022. "“Digital Dividend” or “Digital Divide”: What Role Does the Internet Play in the Health Inequalities among Chinese Residents?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Shiho Kino & Eduardo Bernabé & Wael Sabbah, 2019. "Social Inequalities in Use of Preventive Dental and Medical Services among Adults in European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.